Armed Insurrection is Imminent

Thomas Paine: American Philosopher, & Revolutionary

From 1776 through the formation of The Constitution I helped create America. Now I have returned to help save America. Please join my Facebook group American Patriots in a free and open discussion to further the cause of FREEDOM.  

Newsweek appears to be warning Americans that an “armed insurrection” is imminent. Under the headline, “Millions of Angry, Armed Americans Stand Ready to Seize Power If Trump Loses in 2024”, published on December 20th 2021 [1], David H. Freedman of Newsweek magazine is warning us that democracy is under attack. It’s under attack alright.  Not by the threat of armed militias, by the radical Marxist DNC and their Praetorian Guard, the mainstream media (MSM).

The piece is loaded with propaganda designed to make you think heavily armed militias are going to overthrow the government by force the day after Election Day, or whenever Democrats finish counting their votes, if Trump doesn’t win in 2024.

Of course, all these heavily armed militias are “overwhelmingly white, Republican and southern or rural”, “stoked by misinformation”.

It doesn’t take long for a left-wing “journalist” to forget that the Hillary Clinton campaign mastered the art of political misinformation by funding and promoting the Great Russia Hoax of 2016.  But he did remember that all non-Democrats are what she termed a “basket of deplorables”.  So, just for the fun of it, I’m going to highlight some more of his “brilliant analysis”.

“Democrats worry that voter suppression and election interference from Republican state officials will deny millions of Americans their say at the polling booths.” Whoa now!  It was Democrat election officials in heavily controlled and highly protected polling stations denying access to Republican observers in every battleground state. Don’t believe your lying eyes that may have seen those videos of “election officials” kicking observers out of the room, and covering up the windows.

“Republicans claim, contrary to the evidence, that Democrats have already manipulated vote counts through fraud to steal a presidential election. An October CNN poll found that more than three-quarters of Republicans falsely believe Joe Biden’s 2020 election win was fraudulent.”

“Contrary to the evidence”?  Are you SURE? “CNN poll”?  I wonder if they wanted to project a certain slant?

I could get into the entire fraudulent election thing here, but frankly that’s a debate that deserves its own spot at a different time. For now I’ll just offer this scenario and let you be the judge:

• You are in Investigator.

• There is a cult that operates in several compounds across the country.

• The cult owns and manages the local newspapers.

• There are eyewitness reports of “irregularities”.  It could be any alleged crime.  For this example, I’ll say all of the young children are girls.  The baby boys have disappeared under mysterious circumstances and in several of the compounds.

• Over 1,000 eyewitnesses have signed sworn Affidavits under penalty of perjury.

• Every time you interview the cult leaders in each state, they deny all accusations using the exact same terminology among the different branches/chapters, as if they held a conference call.  Their cult-controlled newspapers don’t even mention the story.

Who are you going to believe?  A thousand independent affiants, or the affiliated cult leaders who have their own lives threatened if the evidence is revealed? That’s the DNC and the MSM in a nutshell.

Freedman goes on to question whether either side would accept the results of a close election that would “likely bring tens of millions of protesters and counter-protesters into the streets”, then warns that “although many Democrats might be inclined to demonstrate, a larger percentage of Republican protesters would almost certainly be carrying guns.”

He cites that “more than three-quarters of Republicans reported ‘low trust’ in the federal government in a Grinnell College national poll in October”, and further, “more than two out of three Republicans think democracy is under attack, according to the Grinnell poll . . . half as many Democrats say the same.” Those findings I can believe, because democracy is under attack – by the Democrats.

Then he inserts that a third of Democrats believe democracy is under attack by Republicans.  How could that even be possible right now?  Republicans currently hold no power in the federal government and unless CNN is on the scene of an organized insurrection at this moment, I don’t think there are any armed conflicts in progress, except for the daily slaughter of victims in Chicago, Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, Detroit, etc., by street gangs.  Oh wait, didn’t Freedman just say the heavily armed militias were “overwhelmingly white, Republican and southern or rural”?

“Mainstream news publications are filled with howls of protest over political outrages by Republican leaders . . . “

Then he cites two newspapers; The Gaston Gazette of Gastonia, NC, which quoted “Thomas Paine’s exhortation to colonists to take up arms against the British”, and “a letter published in September in The New Mexico Sun likewise warns Republicans, “between the traditional Americans and those who want to impose socialism in this country and thus obtain complete government control of its citizens.”

“Mainstream”?  Are you kidding me right now?  I’m pretty sure the Gaston Gazette and the New Mexico Sun are NOT “mainstream”. In fact, I’d say we could confidently call Newsweek mainstream.

Whoever sent the letter to The New Mexico Sun is right, it’s traditional Americans versus those who want to impose socialism.

Thanks to The Gaston Gazette for remembering me, but I am NOT advocating real American patriots “take up arms” against the U.S. government.  My advice is to combat their Marxist ideology with common sense and win elections legitimately, with a keen eye on how they are conducted.  By ballot not bullet.

Comments welcome

[1] Newsweek Magazine, Dec 20,2021

The Socialist Agenda of Alinsky and Obama: Part 2

Thomas Paine: American Philosopher, & Revolutionary

From 1776 through the formation of The Constitution I helped create America. Now I have returned to help save America. Please join my Facebook group American Patriots in a free and open discussion to further the cause of FREEDOM.  

PART 2 – if you have not read Part 1 yet, please click HERE

Barack Obama burst onto the national stage during the 2004 Democrat National Convention in Boston, delivering the Keynote Speech that was revered by the affectionate media.     

On 30 October 2008 at a campaign rally in Columbia, Missouri, Obama said, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

(Paine):  That was the red flag that no one seemed to notice.  Did anyone think to ask him what he meant by “fundamentally transforming” America?  Into what?

Dr. Paul Kengor, Professor of Political Science at Grove City College, says that the definition of totalitarianism is to “seek to fundamentally transform – specifically, to fundamentally transform human nature via some form of political-ideological-cultural upheaval.” [1]

From Obama’s beginnings as a community organizer in Chicago, picking up where Alinsky left off, his modus operandi has been to divide and conquer along racial and ethnic lines, by socio-economic status, relentlessly pushing for the redistribution of wealth from the “Haves” to the “Have Nots”, by vilifying, ridiculing, and condemnation of all political opposition, by attacking traditional institutions, such as law and order, criminal justice, social values, the military,  and the Constitution itself.  The MSM dutifully carries the banner of the DNC.  Isn’t it ironic that the party of tolerance and diversity, a classic liberal tenet, has no tolerance for diverse opinions?

That is why I have said we are now the Divided States of America.  This discord between the liberal left and the conservative right has been simmering for many years, kept respectfully at bay until Barack Obama rose to power. The movement towards socialism/communism did not begin with Obama.  It’s origins go back into the late 19th century, but it has accelerated under his direction, following Alinsky’s playbook almost to the letter.  He is the one person most responsible for driving a wedge between political viewpoints and urging his followers to become more aggressive, more intolerant, more hateful, more divisive towards the “other side of the isle”. It was always his plan to “divide and conquer”, intentionally.

Patriots did not create this division. It was fomented by Obama in a deliberate effort to establish a grievance industry between the “Haves” and the “Have Nots”, to incite racial tension, and to entice all opposition into retaliations that could then be exploited by the left, using the media as his ideological delivery system. That is the true Obama legacy.

I only wish we could stop it and restore America back to the intentions of my fellow founders, a group of United States, with representatives of the people who truly serve to protect its citizens, bestows basic human rights to all men regardless of race, religion, sex, or creed, and offers opportunities for anyone to thrive.

Alinsky wrote, “From the moment the organizer enters a community he lives, dreams, eats, breathes, sleeps only one thing and that is to build the mass power base of what he calls the army.” [2]

(Paine):  How many U.S. Presidents have organized a 30,000 member group of political activists while in office?

ANSWER:  Just the one.  In fact, on his third day in office, Obama recruited and organized the Organizing for America (OFA) political action group, to which he appointed one of his campaign organizers as first Director.  Organizing for America was moved into and run by the Democratic National Committee to mobilize support for Obama’s policy agenda, and to campaign for re-election.  Supposedly separate from the DNC, and organized in all 50 states under national direction, the group filed for, and was granted tax-exempt status as a 501 (c)(4), “as long as it is not primarily involved in activity that could influence an election.”

WHAT?  Primarily?  I wonder if the activists had to document daily time sheets that were no more than 49% dedicated to campaigning?  Remember, it was run by the DNC and Obama’s hand-picked Director.  Tax status aside, the takeaway here is that he started this organization to push his socialist agenda, and it is still active today.

“Organizing for America is essentially a nation-wide lobby organization to promote and build support for Obama’s political agenda” [3]

“Organizing for America has provided logistical support to local community groups, including holding conference calls with volunteers, sponsoring events and house parties, using social networking and New Media, and providing talking points.” [4]

(Paine):  In other words, log in to the conference call and get your instructions.  You will be provided with the “proper” catch phrase on the issue of the week.  Have you noticed the collage-style video clips run by Fox News hosts with all the MSM talking heads echoing the same exact phrase?  That’s the propaganda machine regurgitating the message written and directed by the DNC, perhaps Obama himself.

Just recently, the Biden White House called several media outlets to the carpet, to pressure them into easing up on negative coverage due to his sinking approval ratings.  That sure seems like an Obama move.  Can we see the transcript of that phone conversation?

A newer version, rebranded in 2013, as Organizing for Action, refocused on OFA’s original mission, furthering Obama’s agenda.  He couldn’t just “ride off into the sunset” like every surviving President before him.  No, he believes he must direct the movement to complete his “fundamental transformation” of America into that “political paradise of communism” described by Alinsky.

(Paine):  If you know of any “political paradise” under communist rule that has ever existed in history, please let me know. 

Make no mistake, America as we have known it, is under attack.  It is happening right now.  It continues and escalates every day.  The DNC appears to be under the control of former President Obama.  It is his agenda that is progressing at an alarming pace.  Do you actually believe Joe Biden is running the country?  He can barely read a sentence off the teleprompter.  He’s a puppet being controlled by the “man behind the curtain.”

Their goal is to “fundamentally transform” America into a socialist nation, which will rapidly mutate into a communist nation.  They truly believe that the collective (government bureaucrats) must be in control of nearly aspect of life.  The individual is too stupid to care for himself/herself.  A massive bureaucracy must be in charge of everything in order to mold and shape society as they see fit, classic collectivism.  Nonconformists must be silenced and censored, a phenomenon we see more and more every week, with stories of prominent opponents having their social media accounts suspended by big tech oligarchs.  The “transformation” is in full swing.

Here’s another excerpt from Rules for Radicals;

“ORGANIZATION FOR ACTION will now and in the decade(s) ahead center upon America’s white middle class.  That is where the power is.   . . .

Activists and radicals, on and off our college campuses —people who are committed to change—must make a complete turnabout. With rare exceptions, our activists and radicals are products of and rebels against our middleclass society. All rebels must attack the power states in their society. Our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized, and corrupt.” [5]

(Paine):  If I didn’t know better, I’d swear Obama wrote that.  He even named the 2013 version of his army almost exactly the same as Alinsky’s.  If you recall, Obama’s campaign slogan was “Hope and Change”.  What most people don’t realize is, he sees himself as the Supreme Commander of a revolution of his own creation, attacking the status quo, relentlessly proposing the transfer of wealth, from the “Haves” to the “Have Nots”, and establishing a communistic society.  That’s the “change”. If these radicals are so desperate for change, why don’t they start a GoFundMe campaign and buy their own island where they can live their own socialist utopia? True American patriots like this country just the way it was founded.

He says whatever he needs to say to make the “Have Nots” think they have “hope”, but hasn’t delivered any meaningful results.  He had 8 years as the most powerful man in the world.  How much better is life on the south side of Chicago now?  Or anywhere?

Comments welcome

[1] Kengor, Dr. Paul ; CNS News, 16 January 2017

[2] Alinsky, Saul D. ; Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals ;

Random House, New York, Vintage Books Edition, 1989 ; p.119

[3] Sourcewatch

[4] Wikipedia

[5] Alinsky, Saul D. ; Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals ;

Random House, New York, Vintage Books Edition, 1989 ; p.184

The Socialist Agenda of Alinsky and Obama: Part I

Thomas Paine: American Philosopher, & Revolutionary

From 1776 through the formation of The Constitution I helped create America. Now I have returned to help save America. Please join my Facebook group American Patriots in a free and open discussion to further the cause of FREEDOM.  


The parallels between these two men is so deep, I’ve broken it up into two parts, giving a brief bio of Alinsky and some excerpts from his most famous work.  I’ve added a few comments along the way. 

Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972), American “community activist” and political theorist, wrote a book titled, Rules for Radicals, a book about how to successfully run a movement for change.  His goal was to create a guide for future community organizers, to use in uniting low-income communities in order for them to gain by any means necessary social, political, legal, and economic power. [1]

(Paine):  We saw that “plan” in action every day for the entire summer of 2020 in Seattle, Minneapolis, and other cities, as rioters (pardon me, “mostly peaceful protesters”) converged on areas of their respective cities, to burn and loot without repercussion, as officials stood down under orders from “authorities”.  Organized groups like Antifa and BLM committing crimes in plain sight, on video, gaining social power “by any means necessary”, a favorite catch-phrase of the left. 

Alinsky was active in Chicago in the 40’s, organizing groups like the Back of the Yards Neighborhood Council (BYNC), and the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), through which he focused on the training of community organizers.

He remained at the forefront of revolutionary change during the tumultuous 60’s, inserting himself into the Rochester Race Riot of 1964, pressuring the community and it’s largest employer, Kodak, to open up employment and city governance to better opportunities for African Americans. [2]

In Rules for Radicals, from The Prologue, Alinsky opens the book with this line;

“THE REVOLUTIONARY FORCE today has two targets, moral as well as material. Its young protagonists are one moment reminiscent of the idealistic early Christians, yet they also urge violence and cry, ‘Burn the system down!’ They have no illusions about the system, but plenty of illusions about the way to change our world.” [3]

He goes on, “Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution.   . . .   A revolutionary organizer must shake up the prevailing patterns of their lives— agitate, create disenchantment and discontent with the current values, to produce, if not a passion for change, at least a passive, affirmative, non-challenging climate.” [4]

(Paine):  Tell me that doesn’t sound like Obama – from the victim/grievance attitude to “create disenchantment”, and a “passion for change”.

In the chapter titled, The Purpose, he starts out, “WHAT FOLLOWS IS for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be.  The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.” [5]

Further, under The Ideology of Change, Alinsky said,

“The prerequisite for an ideology is possession of a basic truth. For example, a Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order or the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage—the political paradise of communism.” [6]

(Paine): Democrats can’t wait to arrive at their delusional “political paradise of communism”.

Under Class Distinctions: The Trinity, he wrote,

“Mankind has been and is divided into three parts: the Haves, the Have-Nots, and the Have-a-Little, Want Mores. On top are the Haves with power, money, food, security, and luxury. They suffocate in their surpluses while the Have-Nots starve. Numerically the Haves have always been the fewest. The Haves want to keep things as they are and are opposed to change.”

He goes on, “On the bottom are the world’s Have-Nots. On the world scene they are by far the greatest in numbers. They are chained together by the common misery of poverty, rotten housing, disease, ignorance, political impotence, and despair; when they are employed their jobs pay the least and they are deprived in all areas basic to human growth.  . . .   They hate the establishment of the Haves with its arrogant opulence, its police, its courts, and its churches. Justice, morality, law, and order, are mere words when used by the Haves, which justify and secure their status quo.

. . .  Between the Haves and Have-Nots are the Have-a-Little, Want Mores—the middle class. Torn between upholding the status quo to protect the little they have, yet wanting change so they can get more, they become split personalities. They could be described as social, economic, and political schizoids.” [7]

Rule No. 5 of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals is;

 “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.  It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule.  Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.” [8]

(Paine):  Remind you of anything the DNC and the media employs today?  They run that play like Vince Lombardi ran the power sweep.  We know they are going to run it.  They know we know they are going to run it.  And they know we can’t stop it because anyone who mentions it is vilified even further. 

Ridicule is the “bread and butter” play of the MSM propaganda campaign, constantly brainwashing their viewers that conservatives are nothing more than a “basket of deplorables”, a collection of uneducated racist hillbillies, implying that they hold some sort of moral superiority on the topic of discussion.  The infuriating part is that they overstate their own “authority” and hold the “bully pulpit”, the platform from which all this egregiously offensive behavior emanates.

It is the duty of true American patriots to speak out at every opportunity on any available outlet that the garbage being fed to unsuspecting consumers of “fake news” is pure propaganda.  Get involved.  Research the issues and critically analyze what the “right thing to do” should be in terms of adhering to the Constitution and our founding documents.  Typically, you’ll find that virtually every proposal the DNC comes up with is anti-American, and requires a transition towards communism.

SIDEBAR:  Antifa is an international organization whose name implies they are “anti-fascist”, yet they demonstrate fascist tactics on a regular basis.  They are in fact, self-contradictory 

Alinsky’s biographer, Sanford Horwitt, credits Alinsky “more than anybody . . . for demonstrating that community organizing could be a lifelong career.”  Horwitt saw the influence that Alinsky had on Barack Obama’s work in Chicago as Director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP) from June 1985 to May 1988. [9]

As you will see in Part 2, those influences developed into much more than mere community organizing.  Obama used many of Alinsky’s principles to attack the foundations of America, not by circumstance, but by design.

Comments Welcome.

[1] Wikipedia

[2] Wikipedia

[3] Alinsky, Saul D. ; Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals ;

Random House, New York, Vintage Books Edition, 1989 ; p.6

[4] ibid. ; pp. 11-14

[5] ibid. ; p. 19

[6] ibid. ; p. 25

[7] ibid. ; pp. 32-33

[8] ibid. ; p. 132

[9] Wikipedia

Democrats Love Socialism: The Radicalization of the DNC and the MSM

Thomas Paine: American Philosopher, & Revolutionary

From 1776 through the formation of The Constitution I helped create America. Now I have returned to help save America. Please join my Facebook group American Patriots in a free and open discussion to further the cause of FREEDOM.  

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.  If you know yourself, but not the enemy, for every victory gained suffer a defeat.  If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

  —  Sun Tzu, The Art of War

The Democrats love socialism. They are in total unison to effect the “change” promised by Barack Obama by “fundamentally transforming” America. We must understand who we are dealing with and we must be resolute in our mission.  The Democrat Party, which is governed by the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and their well-oiled propaganda machine, the mainstream media (MSM), is our ideological enemy.  It is the duty of every American Patriot to recognize the radicalization that is well underway.

The New York Times Building in NYC and reminder that their perspective is the “Wrong Way”

NOTE: when I mention the MSM, I am referring to the “alphabet” networks, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and most of the major news organizations like the New York Times, and the Washington Post, which have largely abandoned objective journalism, for blatant, opinion based editorials. They are often collectively referred to as the “legacy media”.

They are a formidable foe and it will not be easy to defeat them, but it is possible if we employ an effective stratagem.  Sun Tzu said the highest form of generalship is to block the enemy’s plans; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.  It would be foolish and suicidal to send a rebel force into battle against the U.S. military.  In the American Revolution we stood face-to-face against the most powerful army in the world, and wore them down by attrition until they lost the will to continue fighting.  That tactic would not work today.

We must win the battle of words by convincing voters that traditional American values are far superior to the radical Marxist ideas emanating from the Democrat Party.

There was a time when the Democrat Party was a respectable political organization.  They brought their voting base into their camp by hailing the virtues of fighting for the little guy, the underprivileged, the oppressed and minority groups, painting themselves as the champions of all noble causes, and claiming the “moral high ground” on virtually any issue.  It always sounded so wonderful and millions were convinced their favorite candidates would “fight like Hell” to bring about the changes they promised would make life better for all Americans.  Those days are over.

Today’s DNC is being led by an extreme radical left-wing faction driving this country towards communism at a rapid pace.  The evidence is everywhere.  This is not your father’s DNC.  This is an entirely different political movement, and the sad part is, many Democrat voters don’t even realize how drastically their party has changed.  The individual voter is not to blame.  Most of them go about their ordinary lives and when the time comes to do their civic duty, they simply vote the way they always have.  It’s only natural that they remain loyal to the political persuasion they were exposed to when they were growing up. 

People become “set in their ways”, forming their worldview at a relatively early age.  Senior citizens aren’t going to sway each other politically, but younger voters who may have experienced some of the disappointment the DNC regularly offers, could be ready for a change.  Plus there will always be new voters coming of age, and those coming off the sideline for messages that resonate.  Those are hearts and minds we must win.

We must expose the DNC as a Marxist movement and convince some of their voting base that the result of their leadership is communism.  As true American patriots, our mission is to resist every machination of their agenda, formulate better ideas, and shout them from the rooftops, to defeat them at the ballot box, and place our representatives in the halls of Congress. I’m not saying you should love every Republican, but when you consider the alternative, it’s no “no-brainer”. 

The American media has openly discarded all pretext of fair, balanced journalism, and collectively morphed into a Democrat controlled propaganda machine, substituting objectivity with clearly biased opinion based “reporting”, and outright vilification of anyone who doesn’t agree with their delusional moral superiority. The media promotes the “politically correct” position on every issue, a term often applied with ludicrous reasoning and no consideration for “unintended consequences”. They constantly lobby for reforms that they believe can be implemented without serious negative reactions. We must support the efforts of any opposing voice and defend their right to express opinions that deviate from the politically correct narrative. 

Listen to everything they say, with extreme skepticism, and a critical mind.  Almost everything they say, and do, defies simple logic, or ignores the inevitable negative ramifications to the detriment of many of the people they claim to champion.

politically correct

[ puhlit-ik-lee kuhrekt ]SHOW IPASee synonyms for: politically correct / political correctness on

adjective marked by or adhering to a typically progressive orthodoxy on issues involving especially ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or ecology: Abbreviations: PC, P.C.

NOTE:  The adjacent definition is from  Notice how their coining of the term “politically correct”, entices the audience into thinking it’s the proper position, the acceptable mindset on identity politics, and/or the right thing to do; classic brainwashing

Let’s look at two examples:

The Vax Passport: Pretzel Logic

We now find ourselves subjected to Soviet style interrogation for some of our normal activities.  Policies have already been adopted to show proof of vaccination in order to enter restaurants and sporting venues.  Proposals are well under way to implement the same restrictions for domestic flights.  You will no longer be permitted to travel freely in your own country.  Let THAT sink in a minute.

In the next breath they say the vaccination won’t prevent you from contracting COVID.  It only reduces the risk of serious illness and hospitalization. 

Talk about theater of the absurd.  Simple logic dictates that if the vaccination won’t prevent you from getting COVID, how does showing your “Vax Passport” protect other people inside a restaurant?  They won’t answer that question, because they can’t.  But they will call you an uneducated insensitive bastard and all the talking heads in the MSM will vilify you incessantly.

CNN “”expert” panel
NOTE:  by the way: it’s pretty clear by the outrageous statements you see and hear from the MSM, that they believe their viewers are too stupid to realize they are being lied to constantly.  They actually think people are supposed to agree with them on everything, remain silent and obey.  They give their viewers no respect whatsoever as critical thinkers.  How dare you question their authority.  I will have much more on the MSM in the coming weeks.

Illegal Immigration: The Ripple Effect

The “open border” policy declared by the Biden administration as soon as he stepped into office, doesn’t have anything to do with humanitarian relief for underprivileged foreign nationals seeking a better life.  It’s purely political.  Give these illegals everything for free and they will vote Democrat as long as the support continues.  Tax the wealthy more to pay for it (or, at least some of it) and let the media flout the virtues of how the DNC is so compassionate to the underprivileged and how the rich should pay their “fair share”.  What they don’t tell you is the negative impact on the economy, in the form of lower wages, the rise in crime, the extra burden on schools, hospitals and infrastructure, the health risks of unscreened immigrants released into the interior amid a pandemic.  They don’t give a damn about actual American citizens.  All they care about is maintaining their own power by importing illegitimate voters.

The war has begun.  This is a call for all true American patriots to stand up and be heard.  Do not be intimidated by their fascist tactics of ridicule and censorship.  Their support is based on deception, misrepresentation, and lies.  We hold the high moral ground.  It is our duty to defend America by saving this country from the heinous Marxist movement being ushered in by the DNC. 

Comments welcomed.