On the 2nd Amendment

Thomas Paine: American Philosopher, & Revolutionary

From 1776 through the formation of The Constitution I helped create America. Now I have returned to help save America. Please join my Facebook group American Patriots in a free and open discussion to further the cause of FREEDOM.

Part 1 of a 3 part series on the 2nd Amendment

Once again, the Democrats have shamelessly exploited a tragic event to resume their attack on the 2nd Amendment.  Their mantra of “never let a good crisis go to waste” is on full display as they pulled up simmering legislative measures and shout their demands into the nearest cameras.

Just to be clear, here is the actual Second Amendment (full text): 

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

  —  Ratified 15 Dec 1791

The recent Uvalde school shooting has placed “sensible gun control” alongside the January 6th Hearings under the brightest spotlights.  Don’t pay any attention to the myriad of disasters the Biden administration has created in the past 17 months.  The most important issues at the moment are to ban “assault weapons” and indict Trump for something, anything that would prevent him from running in ’24.  They haven’t told us what “assault weapons” are, but they’ll just leave it at that so they can expand the definition at whim.  Rest assured, if there are no firearms at all and a mob picks up pitchforks and pikes, they will be classified as “assault weapons” too, even if law-abiding “citizens” (oops, subjects) need them for other useful purposes.

There are numerous bill proposals in the House pending legislation that include a complete ban on all semi-automatic weapons and magazines that have a capacity over 9 rounds of ammunition.

Democrats can’t wait to get to the podium to express their self-righteous moral superiority and exploit the emotions of their supporters by seizing the moment to further corrode our constitutional rights, which are obstacles for the DNC in “fundamentally transforming” America into their utopian dreamscape.  The undeclared objective is to repeal the Second Amendment, disarm law-abiding citizens, and establish their communist regime permanently.

They camouflage their agenda under the guise of public safety, but the reality is; only criminals will be safer, and your citizenship will be transformed into subjugation.

One of the methods they plan to employ is essentially a repeal of the 4th Amendment that bypasses the individuals’ right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures . . . “ ; known as “Red Flag” laws.  There are 10 Republican Senators on board with these “Red Flag” laws, which will permit the “authorities” to enter your home and confiscate your legally owned property without due process based on a complaint, whether legitimate or disingenuous.  Anyone who is mad at you, or dislikes your politics, will be able to file a complaint and all of a sudden a search of your home becomes “reasonable”. 

It’s a two for one “sale”; repeal the 2nd Amendment and get rid of the 4th with it. Apparently, these RINOs and their DumboCrat cohorts have no compunction about violating their oaths to “support and defend” the Constitution. It’s difficult to keep up with their relentless attacks on our civil rights, which “coincidently”, is the Obama stratagem of war; overwhelm as many systems as possible, simultaneously, and erode the foundations of American values, its culture, and its institutions.  He is playing the long game.  He never thought of himself as holding power for eight short years.  The torch of his “legacy” is to be carried by many successors.  That’s why he organized a 30,000 member army of activists to further his agenda.  And that’s why I say he is orchestrating everything we see going on today.  If there was one phone the NSA should be eavesdropping, it’s Obama’s

I can’t imagine ANY President being worse, not even Biden.

Madison and Montesquieu

In Marbury v. Madison (1803), a case considered by many to be the most important case in Supreme Court history, Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of “judicial review”, interpreted as the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress that conflicted with the Constitution.  Marshall’s rationale had to do with creating better balance between the three branches of government; Congress had power to create legislation, regulate expenditures, and impeach officials; the Executive branch (The President) had power to restrain Congress and held veto power over their legislation; but the role of the Supreme Court had not been clearly defined in terms of their checks on the other two branches.

Marshall concluded his written opinion by stating,

“Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”  [1]

The principle of separation of powers can be traced to the French philosopher, Baron de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat (1689-1755), who wrote in his The Spirit of Laws that there should be balanced forces acting against each other to prevent tyranny.  He argued that “the separation of state powers should be by its service to the people’s liberty: legislative, executive and judicial.”  [2]

Let’s look at three of the Democrat “arguments”, and my replies to each one.  All  relate to their demands for stricter gun control.  But before I counter their foolishness with logic, let me warn any would-be trolls who think they can outwit me.  I choose my debates wisely.  That’s why I’m undefeated.  If you find yourself in an argument with me, it’s already over.  You just haven’t been able to accept it yet.  You might call it arrogance.  I’m just saying it matter-of-factly.

The Second Amendment is not absolute. 

Nonsense!  The Constitution is defined by its own language as the “supreme law of the land” [3] and is absolutely established as such.  

In the Preamble to the Bill of Rights, it is stated, in part, “RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.: 

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.”  [4]

In other words, it is clear that the intention of Congress was to recognize the Bill of Rights as integral to the Constitution itself.  They were to be considered to be “supreme laws of the land”.  There is no ambiguity.  They are absolute.

Like ALL of the founders, Jefferson was much wiser than ANYone in Washington today.

When Joe Biden assumes the authoritarian’s pulpit and proclaims that the 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute, he is either ignorant or lying.  Webster defines absolute as “1a: free from imperfection ; PERFECT”.  There is zero possibility to improve it.

I’m guessing the left is using the words of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to persuade their gullible followers that the 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute when he wrote the majority opinion in the landmark case, District of Columbia v. Heller [5], wherein he wrote,in part, “the Second Amendment right is not unlimited . . . “

Biden and the rest of his ilk want you to think “unlimited” rights mean they are not “absolute”.  So they all repeat the phrase “Amendments are not absolute”, echoed ad nauseum by their propaganda machine, the mainstream media, expecting the notion to be accepted by the masses of useful idiots.  Goebbels once said, “If you tell a big lie often enough, it will become the truth.”

Stricter gun control laws work.

On the contrary.  Chicago has some of the most restrictive gun control laws in the country, yet lead the nation every year in homicide by gun.

Top 10 U.S. Cities – ranked by gun deaths 2020 (in parentheses)  [6]

2021 & 2020 data is total number of homicides in each city – by various sources

Chicago: 2021, 797 – (? by gun); 2020, 772 – (692 by gun); 2019, 498 – (448 by gun)

Chicago Police Superintendent David Brown told reporters the bulk of those homicides were gang related.  [7]  I guess black lives don’t matter there.

Philadelphia: 2021, 562 – (? by gun); 2020, 499 – (417 by gun); 2019, (303 by gun)

Houston: 2021, 479 – (? by gun); 2020, 400 – (357 by gun); 2019, (231 by gun)  

New York: 2021, 485 – (? by gun); 2020, 462 – (307 by gun); 2019, (172 by gun)  

Memphis: 2021, 346 – (? by gun); 2020, 332 – (299 by gun); 2019, (190 by gun)   

Detroit: 2021, 309 – (? by gun); 2020, 324 – (290 by gun); 2019, (222 by gun)   

Baltimore: 2021, 338 – (? by gun); 2020, 335 – (272 by gun); 2019, (319 by gun)   

Los Angeles: 2021, 397 – (? by gun); 2020, 349 – (268 by gun); 2019, (190 by gun)   

Dallas: 2021, 220 – (? by gun); 2020, 254 – (218 by gun); 2019, (167 by gun)  

Washington D.C.: 2021, 227 – (? by gun); 2020, 198 – (187 by gun); 2019, (144 by gun)

In 2020, handguns were involved in 59% of all U.S. gun murders, while rifles, including the category often referred to as “assault weapons”, accounted for just 3% of firearm murders.  [8]

All of the Top 10 cities are controlled by Democratic Mayors and all have restrictive gun control laws.  Some of the most restrictive are New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Chicago.  New York is the worst.  All “assault weapons” (whatever they decide that means) are banned.  Magazines are limited to seven rounds, and you can’t even buy ammunition without a background check.  There isn’t a single gun shop in the city of Chicago, yet police confiscated over 1,200 illegal weapons in 2021 and obviously gun control doesn’t work there.  Following an extensive permit procedure, Baltimore requires all successful applicants to post a newspaper article identifying the license holder.  That sounds like an advertisement for would-be burglars that you own a weapon they might want to steal.  

Gun Free Zones are a joke.  Narrow-minded liberals think posting a sign to advise would-be gun toters to leave their weapons at home is a great idea.  They fail to comprehend their message is a clear sign to evil-minded criminals that the facility is a soft target that offers little, if any resistance, where they can attack without much fear of retaliation.

Common sense controls like background checks, and banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines will save lives.

Here are some survey results cited by gun control advocates:  All are taken from a Britannica article titled, Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted?  [9]

A February 2018 Quinnipiac poll found that 97% of American voters and 97% of gun owners support universal background checks, 67% support a nationwide ban on assault weapons, and 83% support mandatory waiting periods for gun purchases.  [155]  It’s a fairly old poll at this point, but we’ll assume the sentiments haven’t changed much.

An NPR survey conducted in February 2019 found that 65% of Americans believed banning high-capacity magazines would reduce gun violence.  [165]

As they often say, “no one needs 30 rounds to hunt deer”.  And they claim that high-capacity magazines transform killings into mass murder. 

True, but their presumption is that deer hunting is the only use for a firearm, as if you’re not allowed to consider your own personal safety. 

During a 1985 debate of the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act amending the Gun Control Act of 1968, then Senator Biden is on record saying, “During my 12 1/2 years as a Member of this body, I have never believed that additional gun control or Federal registration of guns would reduce crime. I am convinced that a criminal who wants a firearm can get one through illegal, nontraceable, unregistered sources, with or without gun control. In my opinion a national register or ban of handguns would be impossible to carry out and may not result in reductions in crime.”  He voted against amendments that would have enacted a 14-day waiting period for handgun sales.  [10]

Now he wants you to think banning guns will remove them completely from the population, but hasn’t told us what his plan is to confiscate them from criminals, just law-abiding citizens.  Criminals don’t care about gun laws and if the government bans semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines, all law-abiding citizens will be severely restricted in any attempt to defend themselves and their families.  When the bad guy breaks in your house with an AR-15, you don’t want to be fighting him with a BB gun.  Furthermore, when seconds count, the police might be there in five minutes.  But don’t worry, they will process the scene carefully and probably collect enough evidence to identify the killer.  They might even lock him up for a few days.

Both the Heller case and in McDonald v. The City of Chicago, the Supreme Court decided that the Second Amendment acknowledged the right for private citizens to possess handguns in their own homes for personal protection.  These are modern-era cases and the Court obviously considered modern weapons.  Most handguns sold in the U.S. for many years now have been semi-automatic weapons with “high-capacity” magazines, holding 10 or more rounds.  It’s difficult to draw much distinction between a semi-automatic handgun and an AR-15 in terms of effectiveness or firepower at close range (inside the home).  In fact, the handgun is easier to handle and therefore a quicker draw in life-threatening situations.

Therefore, hypothetically, any future litigant fighting for his right to protect himself and his family inside his home with an AR-15, banned or not, could cite Heller and McDonald and have a reasonable expectation to win his case before the Supreme Court.  The same argument could be made for “high-capacity” magazines, as the Supreme Court was well aware of modern-day weaponry.  Seven rounds, ten rounds, 15 rounds – what’s the difference?  It’s just an arbitrary number.

Good spot for my own wisdom

I get it; they just want to limit the ability of a criminal to commit mass murder.  Oh wait, isn’t murder against the law already?  So, we can assume mass murder is illegal too.  Criminals don’t care about laws.  Biden himself said in his ’85 debate, “I am convinced that a criminal who wants a firearm can get one through illegal, nontraceable, unregistered sources, with or without gun control.”

If an evil mind wants to commit a massacre, he’ll find a way, whether it’s a bomb, a vehicle, or an illegal AR-15.  Pretzel logic always comes back to bite you in the ass.  They should call it “boomerang logic”.  If you can’t stop the bad guy, why restrict the good guy’s ability to defend himself, his family, and sometimes others?

Academics and politicians who state that none of the Amendments are “absolute” occupy a ludicrous and indefensible position.  If the supreme law of the land isn’t absolute, why have any laws at all ? 

COMMENTS always welcome

See Part 2 of the series HERE

FOOTNOTES

[1]  National Archives ; Marbury v. Madison (1803)

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/marbury-v-madison

[2]  Wikipedia ; Constitution of the United States, Influences

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States

[3]  The Constitution, Article VI, in part (2nd paragraph):

“The Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”

[4]  The Bill of Rights, Preamble

https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/United_States_of_America_1992

[5]  District of Columbia v. Heller (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370, affirmed

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. HELLER ; argued March 18, 2008 – Decided June 26, 2008

Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion and was joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito in a 5-4 decision.  Dissenters were Stevens, Souter, Ginsberg, and Breyer.

HELD: (in part)

1 The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.  Pp 2-53

2  Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited.  It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues.  Pp 54-56

Two years later, the Supreme Court decided the case McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 SCt 3020 (decided June 28, 2010), in favor of the Plaintiff wherein the Court determined that the Second Amendment rights supersede the laws of state and local governments.  In other words, despite Chicago’s strict gun laws, or any other place in America, it is perfectly LEGAL, and your RIGHT, to own a handgun in your home for protection. 

[6]  Everytown Research & Policy, 2020 vs. 2019 Gun Homicides ; Dec 16, 2021

https://everytownresearch.org/report/city-data/

[7]  A. P. ; 2021 Ends as Chicago’s Deadliest Year in a Quarter Century, U.S. News ; Jan 1, 2022

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2022-01-01/2021-ends-as-chicagos-deadliest-year-in-a-quarter-century

[8]  Gramlich, John; What the Data Says About Gun Deaths in the U.S. , Pew Research Center, FBI data ; Feb 3, 2022

[9]  ProCon.org ; Britannica, Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted? ;

Last updated Aug 7, 2020

https://gun-control.procon.org/

[155] Quinnipiac University ; U.S. Support for Gun Control Tops 2-1, Highest Ever ; Feb 20, 2018

https://gun-control.procon.org/additional-resources/footnotes-sources/#155

[165]  Montanaro, Domenico ; npr.org, Americans Largely Support Gun Restrictions to “Do Something” About Gun Violence ; Aug 10, 2019

https://gun-control.procon.org/additional-resources/footnotes-sources/#165

and the NPR article cited;

https://www.npr.org/2019/08/10/749792493/americans-largely-support-gun-restrictions-to-do-something-about-gun-violence

National Public Radio (NPR), an extremely biased “news” outlet, didn’t offer any data on the research methodology and the numbers surveyed.  The article did break down some of the questions and the responses by Democrats, Republicans and Independents surveyed.  For example, in the cited 65% composite response; 86% of Dems were in favor; and 59% of Independents, but just 49% of Republicans thought it would make a difference.

[10]  Frank, BrieAnna J. ; Fact Check: Biden Once Said He ‘Never Believed’ Gun Control, Federal Registration Would Reduce Crime, USA Today ; June 14, 2022

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/06/14/fact-check-biden-once-said-more-gun-control-may-not-reduce-crime/7609342001/

Whoa, where is the Disinformation Bureau?  USA Today admits that he said it, quoting the full context, but wants you to think the quote is a falsehood in the headline.  That’s what I call propaganda.  Your mind has been conditioned to believe that “fact check” means the story is going to debunk the claim.  Otherwise, why put “Fact Check” in the headline?

7,528 thoughts on “On the 2nd Amendment

  1. Pingback: New York Defies Second Amendment Ruling - afoundingfather.com

  2. I am not sure where you are getting your info, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for great information I was looking for this info for my mission.

  3. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  4. I do enjoy the manner in which you have framed this particular matter plus it does provide me personally a lot of fodder for thought. Nevertheless, coming from what precisely I have seen, I really hope when the remarks stack on that folks stay on point and not get started upon a tirade associated with the news of the day. Yet, thank you for this excellent point and though I can not necessarily concur with it in totality, I respect your viewpoint.

    • Karen Basen Engquist I think it s a great conversation to have with your oncologist regardless of whether the oncologist or surgeon or whatever healthcare provider you re speaking to, regardless of whether they bring it up viagra pills for men price We all have different personalities needs, as do our kids this is just what I ve found makes sense for ME

    • In one embodiment, an effective amount of Compound 1 Pattern 1 is administered in combination with an effective amount of dasatinib Sprycel for the treatment of leukemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia propecia price in south africa Combining a 3 5 week cycle of a methylated aas ph ps with a pct of 3 5 weeks of clomid and or nolva would be very taxing on the liver

    • Following the aortic clamp removal, the reperfusion itself may lead to a sudden drop in blood pressure and cellular damage basf levitra 20mg Generic versions of the breast cancer drug tamoxifen and the antibiotic Cipro were both affected by such settlements

    • In patients with volume depletion, correct this condition prior to initiation of QTERNMET XR see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Use In Specific Populations brand name cialis online Someone paid to create a Hortus Conclusus for HCQ and IVM enthusiasts like Kory all astroturf and a sense of unanimous consensus, where never is heard a discouraging word, for their ideas were not surviving out in the hostile larger world of empirical results

  5. Let me just get straight to the point; I saw your blog and I think you would be a great fit for our company :-). We are currently paying upwards of $70/hour for English translators. We are looking for people who are reliable, hardworking, and willing to work long-term. English fluency is preferred, and I don’t think you should have any problems with this requirement. We are an online based company from North Carolina. Interested? Apply here: https://msha.ke/freedomwithtay

    • It s necessary to take a look at your whole glucose values to get the large image not only a single point in time Your numbers are data for each you and your health care group to find out how your diabetes remedy plan are working for you Bring your logs or, no less than, your meter to all of your regular provider visits and make sure your provider seems at your numbers Be careful what you eat be significantly aware of how snacking and eating sugary meals or carbohydrates can affect your blood sugar degree propecia cost walmart Fall is once again upon us, so let s keep fall a positive word fall in love with the beautiful fall colors, but please don t fall down

  6. : 而使用「麻将」二字的文献则出现较晚,最早见于 1909 年成书的《宦海升沉录》,第十三回写道:「但见上房内,有儿个妇女还围在一张桌子上打麻将,旁边立著几个丫环递烟。」民国时期,胡适可谓是「麻将」派的第一人,他在自己的日记以及《漫游的感想》一书中,均使用「麻将」一词。可见,「麻雀」这一称呼出现比「麻将」要早,民国时期虽然两种称呼同时存在,但「麻雀」的写法流传更广。 在猫爪边玩游戏边赚钱 但专供人打麻将的“雀庄”逐渐减少,日本最多时曾有36173家(1978年)但2018年时也还有9176家,以人口比而言,最多的是冲绳县、宫崎县、福冈县、东京都、高知县。我住在东京,车站附近也还有些雀庄,除了少数连锁店化的雀庄外,大多很老旧。 http://demo7.1stopwebsitesolution.com/ahrideandshop/community/profile/claraj22454152/ 看小的点数的骰子的数字确定保留几列,比如数字是3,就从第四列开始取。 只有南风拿到算一番的牌:夏,兰 麻将打点子,应该从自己的左手边拿牌还是右手边拿牌呢??? 麻将拿牌顺序是:庄家抓第一轮,庄家左方抓第二轮,庄家对方抓第三轮,庄家右方抓第四轮,依次按顺时针方向循环拿牌。麻将,起源于中国,粤港澳及闽南地区俗称麻雀,由中国古人发明的博弈游 ②其他玩家打了很久但没成功拿下的大鱼也是一个目标,因为这些大鱼经过了大量炮弹的洗礼,他们的防御力已经消耗了大半,这时候如果能补上几炮,下分的概率很大; 一般麻将的骰子是两个,掷骰子的人为庄家,比如掷出来的数字是3和6,从庄家逆时针开始数到第九家(两个数字的和)的

    • A centerpiece of the FDA s safety surveillance efforts is the Adverse Drug Event Reporting System viagra lowers blood pressure The researchers found that 7 of patients were not compliant with recommended chemotherapy treatment and 4 of patients were not compliant with the recommended radiation treatment

  7. Okay, this might be a little bit random, but I saw your blog and had to ask, are you interested in a translation job? I know I’m a stranger but I felt like doing a good deed today by alerting a couple people that a good position has opened up here: https://msha.ke/freedomwithtay and they pay sometimes even $70/hour. Okay, they won’t always give that amount, I only made around $400 last week, but it’s part time and when times are tight, every little bit helps. Hope it helps, and my apologies if you’re not interested. Have a great day/evening!

  8. Wow! This can be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I’m also a specialist in this topic so I can understand your effort.

    • t quite get to a ball in the hole between third and short cialis reviews Enzyme inducing AEDs EIAEDs cause about a 2 fold to 3 fold faster clearance of concurrent chemotherapeutic drugs metabolized along the same pathway, including cyclophosphamide, irinotecan, paclitaxel, and teniposide, and up to 4 fold faster clearance with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors crizotinib, dasatinib, imatinib, and lapatinib

  9. Thanks for these pointers. One thing I additionally believe is the fact that credit cards featuring a 0 monthly interest often attract consumers together with zero rate of interest, instant authorization and easy internet balance transfers, but beware of the top factor that can void your own 0 easy neighborhood annual percentage rate and throw you out into the poor house fast.

  10. I think this is one of the most significant info for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The website style is perfect, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers

  11. Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I抣l be grateful if you continue this in future. Lots of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  12. Good day! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share. Kudos!

  13. Hi! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could locate a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having difficulty finding one? Thanks a lot!

  14. Thank you for another informative website. The place else may I am getting that type of info written in such an ideal method? I’ve a mission that I’m simply now running on, and I have been on the look out for such info.

  15. Definitely imagine that which you stated. Your favourite reason appeared to be at the web the easiest thing to understand of. I say to you, I definitely get irked whilst other people think about issues that they just don’t know about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top as neatly as defined out the entire thing with no need side-effects , folks could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you

    • Similarly, adding Nintedanib, a triple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR 1 3, FGFR 1 3, and PDGFR О± and ОІ to GC showed that while there was no significant difference in pathologic responses, both 12 months and 24 months PFS and OS were significantly improved with addition of angiogenesis inhibition 30 lasix 12.5 mg for dogs

    • 5 7 This attitude persists with a number of studies demonstrating that most patients do not need to have axillary lymph node surgery 8, 9 and all of them have led to better outcomes for our patients with early stage breast cancer best price for generic cialis IRF 1 can function as a tumor suppressor and can signal to apoptosis through both p53 dependent and p53 independent pathways 71

    • In preclinical systems, many of the molecular events in this process have been tracked in detail as a function of time caspase 3 activation, cleavage of poly ADP ribose polymerase PARP, and terminal dUTP nick end labelling TUNEL, a measure of DNA fragmentation best price cialis 20mg So it is After more than ten breaths, Tablets That Lower Blood Pressure alternative ways to lower blood pressure naturally Zhao Ling suddenly opened his eyes, and a sneer appeared on his face

    • Liposome Assay women viagra cvs bactrim diclofenac sodium and paracetamol tablets side effects During the final month of taking the drug or placebo, participants took breath tests to detect carbon monoxide and verify whether they had abstained from smoking

  16. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. Sometimes you have to check about your partner’s personality, but you don’t know how is it possible. So, don’t worry I have one test which is a personality test. With the help of this test, you know everything about your partner’s personality. To know more, visit it.

    • P glycoprotein renders multidrug resistance during cancer chemotherapy afib and viagra Zhao Ling can taking magnesium quickly lower blood pressure is also certain that the Does A Water Pill Lower Bp which herbal tea is best for high blood pressure power that erupts after the fusion of the two spirit fires is enough to burn the entire sea of blood to dryness Qinglian Fire and Phoenix Fire If you think you can burn my blood to dryness just like this, then you are too naive Seeing the flame in Zhao Ling is hand, a gloomy voice came out Herbs To Lower High Blood Pressure prevastatin to lower bp of his heart again

  17. Picture this – 3 am in the morning, I had a line of fiends stretched around the corner of my block. It was in the freezing middle of January but they had camped out all night, jumping-ready to buy like there was a sale on Jordans. If you were 16 years old, in my shoes, you’d do anything to survive, right? I got good news though; I MADE IT OUT OF THE HOOD, with nothing but a laptop and an internet connection. I’m not special or lucky in any way. If I, as a convicted felon that used to scream “Free Harlem” around my block until my throat was sore, could find a way to generate a stable, consistent, reliable income online, ANYONE can! If you’re interested in legitimate, stress-free side hustles that can bring in $3,500/week, I set up a site you can use: https://incomecommunity.com

    • A chemotherapeutic moiety of Formula 2 can have the structure A NQ Z C R C R R C R C R R, wherein A is methyleneoxy CH O, Q is a free electron pair, Z is a bond, each R is independently selected from hydrogen and deuterio; and each R is independently selected from chloro Cl, bromo Br, iodo I, alkyl sulfonate OSO R, wherein R is selected from C alkyl, C per fluoroalklyl sulfonate OSO R, wherein R is selected from and C per fluoroalkyl, and hydroxyl OH, and the chemotherapeutic moiety is CH O N CH ₘDₘ CH в‚™Dв‚™ R, wherein m and n are independently selected from 0, 1, and 2 is viagra dangerous

    • but it came back negative cheapest cialis online 1B A low magnification image showing expression of tdTomato in perivascular mural cells of brain microvessels in the primary somatosensory cortex of PdgfrОІ Flp; Cspg4 FSF CreER mice crossed with the Ai14 reporter mice 2 weeks after tamoxifen treatment TAM, 4 injections, 40 mg kg, i

    • 4 The diagnostic criteria require at least 2 attacks with 1 or more fully reversible aura symptoms, and at least 3 of the following features 1 aura spreading gradually over 5 minutes; 2 2 or more auras occurring in succession; 3 aura symptoms lasting 5 to 60 minutes; 4 unilateral aura; 5 positive aura; or 6 aura accompanied or followed by a headache within 60 minutes cialis online without prescription Islets were then manually traced and quantified using ImageJ software NIH